(This story courtesy of MIRS, a Lansing-based news and information service.)
House Judiciary Committee members had some hard questions May 19 about legislation that would give immunity to hospitals, nursing homes, and health care providers from civil suits related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
In the end, the bill designed to tie up a loose end caused by the Legislature not extending the governor’s original emergency declaration didn’t move out of committee.
“If this bill passes, if it actually gets signed in its current form, which is incredibly unlikely, then plaintiffs would be unable to bring a suit or a theory saying that there was a failure to exercise appropriate care under the circumstances?” Rep. Brian Elder (D-Bay City) asked of Amy Barkholz of the Michigan Health and Hospital Association. She testified in support of SB 0899, sponsored by Sen. Michael MacDonald (R-Sterling Heights).
Elder contended that under current law, “a regime of Michigan tort reform, it is already incredibly difficult to bring medical malpractice cases.” In court, the judge would have to consider the circumstances, which would necessarily include the fact that the state is under a pandemic.
“You are saying that a person, if they can find a lawyer, if they can actually get all of the experts [Read More]
By CARMEN HEREDIA & ANNA ALMENDRALA
As a contact tracer, Teresa Ayala-Castillo is sometimes asked whether herbal teas and Vicks VapoRub can treat COVID-19. These therapies aren’t exactly official health guidance, but Ayala-Castillo isn’t fazed. She listens and then suggests other ideas — like getting rest and drinking plenty of fluids.
“I don’t want to call them old wives’ tales, but these remedies are things that I’m 100 percent familiar with because my mom used them on me,” said Ayala-Castillo, a bilingual first-generation Ecuadorian American who works for the city of Long Beach, California.
Health departments across the United States are working at a furious pace to staff their armies of contact tracers to control the spread of the coronavirus that causes COVID-19. Experts estimate local and state health departments will have to add 100,000 to 300,000 people to get the economy back on track.
As they build these forces, many states and localities are trying hard to hire from the racial and ethnic minority communities hit hardest by the virus. They’re anticipating a need for skilled, culturally competent tracers who can convert suspicious or hesitant contacts into enthusiastic, willing participants in the drive to stamp out the virus.
Virus-tracking activities vary by state. Most states have created plans to [Read More]
By EWA MATUSZEWSKI
The emergence of a best practices playbook for physician practices following the pandemic is likely as close as any primary care physician practice has come to having a strategic plan. Of course, a playbook or return-to-work strategy is not a strategic plan. It is focused on health and safety for patients, practice teams, vendors and anyone who sets foot in a physician’s office. But if you haven’t considered adopting a broader strategic plan as an offshoot of a playbook, it’s advisable to do so now.
Learn from other industries. I was in the trenches with PCPs as they struggled with financial issues, staff layoffs, insufficient personal protection equipment and other COVID-19 induced threats to a practice’s viability. Prior to the recent availability of guidance from national and state medical agencies and professional medical associations, which came far too late in my opinion, I turned to social media as part of my information gathering process to create our own back-to-work manual. That’s where I “met” Gary Johnson, Chief Manufacturing and Labor Affairs Officer at Ford Motor Company.
I don’t know Mr. Johnson, but I requested permission via LinkedIn to utilize the Ford Motor Company COVID-19 Playbook. He gave me permission and I incorporated some of the [Read More]
By KAITLIN NUCCI
On May 21, Gov. Gretchen Whitmer issued Executive Order No. 2020-96 in response to the steady drop in confirmed daily cases of COVID-19. This new order has lifted the postponement of non-essential medical and dental procedures as of May 28 at 11:59 PM. Upon the resurgence of these medical and/or dental services, outpatient healthcare facilities will be subject to the workplace safety rules as provided in Executive Order 2020-97. These restrictions aim to continue the downward trend in daily confirmed cases, while acknowledging that COVID-19 remains a danger in the state of Michigan.
Executive Order 2020-97 enacts safeguards that facilities must use in providing non-essential services. These facilities will be required to post signs at entrances that instruct patients to wear some sort of face covering while inside. Patients will be required to wear this face covering while inside the facility, except as necessary for identification purposes or to conduct an examination or procedure, and facilities must provide face coverings and hand sanitizer at the patient entrances. Of course, employees will be required to properly use their personal protective equipment pursuant to CDC and OSHA guidelines.
A facility’s waiting area capacity must be limited to the number of people who can be present while [Read More]
By MARK E. WILSON
Over the past few months the State of Michigan along with the world has been stricken by a pandemic not seen for the last 100 plus years. Throughout the last few months the learning curve has been steep while the best medical and scientific minds have struggled to learn everything possible about the disease.
In Michigan at the end of May there had been nearly 58,000 cases and more than 5500 deaths due to Covid-19. It is likely we will find out that even more people have had the virus but never knew it. The shelter in place, social distancing, masking and closing of the economy were widely accepted as the only anecdotes available in the early days. The impact on those anecdotes will likely result in the State unemployment numbers being in the millions. Throughout the pandemic, reliance on the science and the data became the lynch pins for actions taken to save lives. And while every expert does not believe it is over, imagine the stress on the State’s citizens, economy and its health care system if the vast majority of the symptoms were not “mild.”
As more and more becomes known on how to limit exposure, protect people and eventually [Read More]
(This feature presented in cooperation with MIRS, a Lansing-based news and information service)
Statewide COVID-19 Testing At Center Of Recovery Plan
Michigan should implement statewide COVID-19 testing system to ensure people coming back into the workforce are not spreading the coronavirus, Business Leaders for Michigan advocated June 1 as part of their economic recovery plan.
The group is suggesting repurposing existing state and federal money and streamlining the government approval process to assist employers in getting their displaced workers back on the job safely.
In laying out the business roundtable’s three-part plan, BLM President & CEO Doug Rothwell also is advocating for the Department of Transportation and county road commissions to put a priority on starting “shovel ready” projects.
They want a streamlined permitting process, money put back into the Pure Michigan tourism program, and helping Michigan Business Connect with suppliers as their global supply chains adjust.
The Business Leaders also want a review of the state’s tax structure and the state Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs to accelerate certificate programs for in-demand positions.
At the front of all these proposals, Rothwell said, is putting a priority on protecting public health as part of its COVID-19 plan.
“The shutdown of operations across industries is unprecedented,” Rothwell said. “There was no playbook [Read More]
(This story presented as part of a cooperative effort between Healthcare Michigan and MIRS, a Lansing-based news and information service.)
Detroit reported that the city’s COVID-19 related deaths continues to decline, with nine additional deaths reported May 1, bringing the city’s total to 1,045.
Mayor Mike Duggan said in his daily press briefing that the number of deaths at nursing homes, however, continues to grow. By May 1, 233 nursing home residents and three staff had died after testing positive for COVID-19, he said.
“The numbers are coming down extremely fast,” he said. “What we’re doing is continuing to work … Before this is over, we’re going to find a quarter to a third of all the deaths in the city occurred at the nursing homes and senior living facilities.”
Duggan said the numbers are low, in part, because “we did not get a bunch of old death certificates” from the state. He prefers to measure the city’s progress by using the weekly numbers, saying the city had 197 COVID-19-related deaths weeks four weeks ago compared to 81 this week.
To date, the city has 9,192 positive COVID-19 cases, city health officer Denise Fair said.
The Mayor also announced that more than 400 city employees were scheduled to return to [Read More]
By JULIE ROVNER
The United States is in the midst of both a public health crisis and a health care crisis. Yet most people are not aware these are two distinct things. Further, the response for each is going to be crucial.
If you are not a health professional of some stripe, you might not realize that the nation’s public health system operates in large part separately from the system that provides most people’s medical care.
Dr. Joshua Sharfstein, a former deputy commissioner for the Food and Drug Administration and now vice dean at the school of public health at Johns Hopkins in Baltimore, distinguishes the health care system from the public health system as “the difference between taking care of patients with COVID and preventing people from getting COVID in the first place.”
In general, the health care system cares for patients individually, while public health is about caring for an entire population. Public health includes many things a population takes for granted, like clean air, clean water, effective sanitation, food that is safe to eat, as well as injury prevention, vaccines and other methods of ensuring the control of contagious and environmental diseases.
In fact, it is public health, not advances in medical care, that has accounted for [Read More]
By EWA MATUSZEWSKI
Will healthcare be forever changed in a post-COVID-19 world? Hopefully yes and hopefully no. We must of course hang on to what is good about our healthcare system. Primary care physicians and nurse practitioners affirming the care model of the patient-centered medical home. Fearless leaders such as Dr. Kimberly Farrow, CEO of Central City Integrated Health, and Dr. Anthony Clarke of Health Centers of Detroit, who toiled away in the heart of the city, the epicenter of Michigan’s pandemic, to treat, comfort, educate and encourage our state’s neediest patients. In the meantime, minutes and hours away, family medicine physicians, internal medicine docs, pediatricians and other Michigan providers also cared for their patients, some introducing makeshift telehealth, others treating, if not COVID-19 symptoms, then the anxiety and depression they spawned. And that will be a healthcare change.
There will be a new COVID-19 post-traumatic stress disorder experienced by healthcare workers, first responders and grocery store clerks. Primary care providers and behavioral health specialists must be prepared. These same professionals must plan to support and care for each other, as well as colleagues who engaged in the war against COVID-19 with varying degrees of battlefield exposure. From the front lines to federally qualified health centers to [Read More]
(EDITOR’S NOTE: The opinions expressed below are those of the author and not necessarily those of Healthcare Michigan or its publisher.)
By SUSAN ADELMAN, MD
One nation in the developed world stands out for its exceptional approach to the coronavirus pandemic – Sweden. While most Americans were locked down, we looked with jealousy at pictures of Swedes walking on the streets, seemingly unconcerned, living normal lives. How could they do that, and has it worked?
First, it is a myth that the Swedes have had no restrictions, but their rules certainly have been more relaxed than those in most of Europe or in the United States. While their schools remained open for younger children, colleges and universities went online. Businesses and hair salons are open, but people are advised to work from home where possible. Home care and nonessential travel were banned, and so were gatherings of more than 50 people. Restaurants remained open but not bars. Restaurants had to maintain 1.5 meters of separation between tables. Almost all games are closed or must be played without an audience. Concerts and large social activities are closed. Social distancing is voluntary, but the Swedes dutifully stay away from each other. Sweden’s borders are closed to non-EU residents. Internal travel [Read More]
By KIMBERLY RUPPEL
In this new normal we are experiencing as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, social distancing and telehealth go hand in hand. Telehealth includes a range of technology, for example, the use of real-time video interaction, “store and forward” technology, remote patient monitoring or online chat groups.
Telehealth is particularly well suited for initial screening of patients and providing quicker and safer access to providers now, and also once we are safely beyond the current health crisis. As a result, this is a critical time for healthcare providers to encourage their patients to make use of this valuable tool and to implement or improve processes and systems already in place. More often, older patients are reluctant to give up the familiar in-person encounter.
Yet, that is exactly the population that may benefit the most from the efficiency and convenience of avoiding travel time or sitting in a waiting room possibly subjecting themselves to exposure to unknown health risks from other patients.
Both federal and state guidelines on this topic are rapidly evolving, many of which are intended to be temporary and only apply while the current state of public health emergency remains in effect. The CARES Act provides a number of important temporary waivers of [Read More]
By STEPHEN SHAVER
The outbreak of COVID-19 sent shockwaves through the healthcare industry. Drastic declines in the hospital and healthcare provider revenue have hamstrung their ability to response to the outbreak and, in some cases, caused providers to shut down entirely. In response, Congress passed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act, which included the creation of the Provider Relief Fund. The fund’s goal is to provide direct financial relief to hospitals and healthcare providers. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has been charged with distributing the fund’s $175 billion war chest.
The fund’s distributions have been divided into general allocations, to be distributed to a wide range of providers, and targeted allocations, to be distributed to areas of need to address the COVID-19 outbreak. To be eligible for a portion of the $50 billion general allocations, a provider must have billed Medicare in 2019 and provided care for actual or possible cases of COVID-19 after Jan. 31, 2020. Guidance indicates HHS considers all patients to be possible cases of COVID-19. Most of this allocation was deposited in early- and mid-April 2020 directly into bank accounts associated with each qualifying recipient’s Tax Identification Number (TIN). Additional general allocation funds were made available [Read More]
(EDITOR’S NOTE: Opinions expressed here are those of the author and not necessarily those of Healthcare Michigan or its publisher)
By ALLAN DOBZYNIAK, MD
The reaction to the COVID-19 virus hysteria is financially devastating to Michigan’s hospitals and many others throughout the country and world. The burning question is whether all of this is necessary. Hospitals have been devastated by erroneous assumptions based on incomplete, premature and error-laden data. This has led to flawed models, given credence from a consensus of two physicians. Finally, politics has warped clear analysis and solutions. The idea that there might be a middle ground regarding hospitals’ economic vulnerabilities and that of the livelihoods of millions of others in the United States is totally absent from discussions. Factually, there were many fewer cases, many fewer deaths, plenty of ventilators and plenty of hospital beds.
Worse, as increasingly reliable data is available, reasonable change in policy has lagged. The flu season just ending has caused more infections, more deaths and more hospitalizations, but it did not cause the public health and financial destruction of COVID-19. Any job is a vital job to the person who has lost it. Does anybody really know the death number, death rate, number of infections or recoveries? Does anybody [Read More]
By RACHANA PRADHAN & CHRISTINA JEWETT
A high-ranking federal official in late February warned that the United States needed to plan for not having enough personal protective equipment for medical workers as they began to battle the novel coronavirus, according to internal emails obtained by Kaiser Health News.
The messages provide a sharp contrast to President Donald Trump’s statements at the time that the threat the coronavirus posed to the American public remained “very low.” In fact, concerns were already mounting, the emails show, that medical workers and first responders would not have enough masks, gloves, face shields and other supplies, known as PPE, to protect themselves against infection when treating COVID-19 patients.
The emails, part of a lengthy chain titled “Red Dawn Breaking Bad,” includes senior officials across the Department of Veterans Affairs, the State Department, the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Health and Human Services, as well as outside academics and some state health officials. KHN obtained the correspondence through a public records request in King County, Washington, where officials struggled as the virus set upon a nursing home in the Seattle area, eventually killing 37 people. It was the scene of the first major outbreak in the nation.
“We should plan assuming we [Read More]
By EWA MATUSZEWSKI
Despite its high-tech sounding name and implications, telehealth is not new. Our own organization was using it years ago for a very challenged subset of society—teems who had urgent and ongoing mental health needs living in rural areas underserved by behavior health specialists.The grant-funded program was offered with the assistance of Michigan Medicine and I strongly believe it was a lifesaver for some teens. Despite relatively early adoption in this and other select cases, though, I certainly can’t brag that all of our practices were using—or even remotely interested (pun intended) in—telehealth. It was a continuum from zero awareness to occasional use. What a difference a pandemic makes!
Interestingly, one of the earliest adopters of telehealth in mid-March 2020 was a “senior” internal medicine physician in our organization who still uses paper charts. He saw 30 patients in one day using telehealth. Moreover, many of these patients were elderly. The practice team, frequently the receptionist (thank goodness for high performing teams), walked patients who were amenable to it through the relatively easy telehealth set-up process.
Wait! Doesn’t a practice need an EHR to use telehealth? Surprisingly no. Any device can be used for “video chat” in a pinch, although it’s not advisable long-term, for reasons [Read More]
(This story presented in cooperation with MIRS, a Lansing-based news and information service)
Multiple southeast Michigan hospitals are at capacity with COVID-19 patients and several more expect to hit capacity the first week of April as the number of patients continues to climb, according to the president and CEO of the Michigan Health and Hospital Association.
Michigan’s COVID-19 cases jumped to 6,498 by 3 p.m. March 30 with 81 percent still in the three-county region of Macomb, Oakland, and Wayne counties. Detroit continues to be the epicenter with 1,801 cases and 52 deaths.
With 134 hospitals statewide and roughly half in Southeast Michigan, Gov. Gretchen Whitmer is accepting the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ recommendation to move 900 bed spaces into TCF Center, formerly Cobo Hall, to address imminent capacity issues.
Even with the extra capacity, MHA President Brian Peters continues to have concerns. The first is what happens if the coronavirus spreads outstate and there is not a large facility like the TCF Center available to convert into a field hospital.
“Southeast Michigan, Detroit is experiencing the brunt of that now,” Peters said. “Our greatest concern is that we’re going to see that occurring in communities throughout the state of Michigan in the days and weeks ahead.”
One projection [Read More]
By RALPH LEVY
A recent Tax Court Memorandum decision, S. Ghadiri-Asli v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo 2019-149, serves as a reminder for healthcare providers to report properly all gross receipts and to substantiate business expenses claimed as deductions.
One of the two taxpayers, a physician, practiced medicine as a sole practitioner who specialized in infectious diseases. During the years in question, the physician’s billing and collection functions were performed by a third party outside billing service. All payments were remitted directly to the physician. Using the information provided by the physician to the billing service that included explanation of benefit (EOB) forms, patient face sheets and other correspondence received by the physician, the billing service would bill both third-party payors and patients for medical services provided by the physician. Each month the billing service would send the physician a summary of billings and collections received using the EOB’s and the other information provided by the physician. Each summary included an invoice for the services provided by the billing service based on a percentage of the total monthly payments received by the physician during the prior month. Although occasionally the physician questioned discrepancies between the monthly summaries and the physician’s bank statements, the physician always paid the amount [Read More]
By JONEL ALLECIA
An outbreak of coronavirus disease in a nursing home near Seattle is prompting urgent calls for precautionary tactics at America’s elder care facilities, where residents are at heightened risk of serious complications from the illness because of the dual threat of age and close living conditions.
The emergence of the novel contagious illness at the Life Care Center of Kirkland, Washington, has left one resident dead and four others hospitalized, with three in critical condition, local health officials said late last month. A health care worker in her 40s also remained in satisfactory condition. The resident who died was a man in his 70s with underlying health conditions, officials said.
Officials previously said that of the nursing home’s 108 residents and 180 staff members, more than 50 have shown signs of possible COVID-19 infections, the name given the illness caused by a novel coronavirus that emerged from Wuhan, China, late last year. Visits from families, volunteers and vendors have been halted and new admissions placed on hold, according to a statement from Ellie Basham, the center’s executive director.
“Current residents and associates are being monitored closely, and any with symptoms or who were potentially exposed are quarantined,” she wrote.
The cluster of illness is the first of [Read More]
Michigan Chief Medical Officer Joneigh S. Khaldun told a Senate committee Feb. 27 that while there is no drug to attack the coronavirus, she and the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services are working to utilize the tools they do have—screening, communication and education.
Khaldun told the Senate Health Policy and Human Services Committee, “If this were to come to Michigan, we’d be focusing on non-pharmaceutical intervention.”
Khaldun noted that the state is closely monitoring the spread of the virus. The Detroit Metro Airport is one of 11 airports across the country where U.S. citizens who are considered at high risk based on their travels can re-enter the United States.
A process exists at Detroit Metro to identify those who need to be monitored. Currently, there are no confirmed cases in Michigan where travelers have been diverted from the airport to a hospital and quarantined. However, in one case a traveler was taken to the hospital, but later confirmed to not have the virus.
Sen. Paul Wojno (D-Warren) asked Khaldun if a university or college would need to be quarantined if the virus were detected on campus.
“We’ll have to take that on a case-by-case basis,” Khaldun responded.
Talk of quarantine led Sen. Kim La Sata (R-St. Joseph) to ask [Read More]
By EWA MATUSZEWSKI
The venture capitalist will see you now. Unfortunately, it’s not the lead-in to a joke. It’s the next inevitable step in usurping the role of primary care. As those of us long invested in the health-centered goals of the primary care community mark wins with the patient-centered medical home, team-based care and care management strategies; as we dive deeper into the role that social determinants of health play in limiting access to care and optimal health and wellness – and offer practical solutions; as we find success with data-driven, population health strategies…the business people see dollar signs, instead.
The impetus for this blog is the early February news that Humana entered into an arrangement with a private equity firm (okay maybe not venture capitalist – but outsiders, nonetheless) to create primary care clinics focused on the Medicare Advantage and dual-eligible population. Doing so will add to Humana’s existing senior primary care clinics, which have a multi-state footprint and were designed to lower healthcare costs while grabbing market share among the mighty senior population. It’s not just Humana, though, it’s a trend among large insurers and health systems. (I must add here that it irks me that the venture capitalists, private equity firms and other [Read More]
JESSE A. MARKOS, ESQ.
Wachler & Associates, P.C.
Licensed Medical Professionals generally experience the same risk of developing problems with alcohol or drugs as those in other professions. An estimated 10 to 14 percent of medical professionals develop such problems at some point during their careers. However, they are five times more likely to misuse prescription medications such as opioid pain medications and benzodiazepine anti-anxiety drugs. Medical professionals are uniquely vulnerable to these medications due to a combination of stress, long hours and increased access. Those struggling with prescription medication abuse should immediately seek treatment. One option available is the Michigan Health Professional Recovery Program (HPRP). However, this particular recovery program may not be the right choice for all and some degree of caution should be exercised when considering a self-referral to the program.
The purpose of HPRP is generally to promote the health and well-being of medical professionals with substance abuse and mental health issues and also to protect patients from impaired providers. Medical professionals can self-refer to HPRP and seek help with a substance abuse or mental health issue. However, there is no assurance that voluntarily seeking treatment will not result in disciplinary action by the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs.
After a medical professional [Read More]
By ELISABETH ROSENTHAL
It has been nearly three months since the first cases of a new coronavirus pneumonia appeared in Wuhan, China, and it is now a global outbreak. Yet, despite nearly 90,000 infections worldwide (most of them in China), the world still does not have a clear picture of some basic information about this outbreak.
In recent weeks, a smattering of scientific papers and government statements have begun to sketch the outlines of the epidemic. The Chinese national health commission has reported that more than 1,700 medical workers in the country had contracted the virus as of Feb 14—that is alarming. The Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention estimated that some 80 percent of those infected have a mild illness—that is comforting. Last month, a joint World Health Organization-China mission announced that the death rate in Wuhan was 2 percent to 4 percent, but only 0.7 percent in the rest of China — a difference that makes little scientific sense.
In recent days, the WHO has complained that China has not been sharing data on infections in health care workers. Last month, the editors of the journal Nature called on researchers to “ensure that their work on this outbreak is shared rapidly and openly.”
Much more could [Read More]
By JEREMY BELANGER with L. PAHL ZINN
Many providers are familiar with compliance in a health care context. They know to make agreements compliant with the Stark Law and the Anti-Kickback Statute, for instance. But the keys to a good compliance system (policies and procedures, designation of a compliance officer/committee, training and education, communication, ethics and culture, top-down compliance, enforcement, auditing and monitoring, and corrective action) apply to areas outside of health care as well, including the operation of a business. This article will discuss two areas in which a business should apply the principles of compliance to their business practices: antitrust and tax.
Broadly speaking, antitrust laws are about protecting and promoting competition in the marketplace. Section 1 of the Sherman Act prohibits agreements between parties that unreasonably restrain trade. Two types of analyses are employed in evaluating whether agreements between competitors constitute unreasonable restraints: per se and rule of reason. Certain agreements are so likely to harm competition with no immediately discernable procompetitive benefit are subject to challenge as per se unlawful. Examples include price-fixing, bid-rigging, or agreements between competitors to divide markets. The rule of reason is a factual inquiry into the agreement’s overall competitive effect to determine whether procompetitive benefits of an [Read More]
Gov Encourages Fist Bumps, ‘Smart’ Hygiene As MI Preps For Coronavirus
If you see Gov. Gretchen Whitmer giving people fist bumps instead of handshakes, here’s why.
Replacing handshakes with fist bumps or “elbow bumps” were among the suggestions made by Whitmer as she and state officials outlined what they are doing to prepare for any potential coronavirus outbreak in Michigan and how the general public can prevent against it.
There are still no active cases in Michigan. No one is currently under investigation for coronavirus. And the five people in Michigan who were tested for it previously all came up negative.
The governor Feb. 28 announced the activation of the State Emergency Operations Center to begin coordinating state, local and federal agencies on preventing any spread of the disease.
The SEOC is typically activated during state emergencies, such as during the extreme cold temperatures from early 2019. The Governor said today that by activating the SEOC, “we’re ensuring that every branch of state government is on alert, and actively coordinating to prevent the spread of Coronavirus if it comes to Michigan. We are taking this step out of an abundance of caution.”
The actual SEOC itself is a large room within the Michigan State Police headquarters where representatives from state agencies—including [Read More]
The state’s new approach to revamp mental health services proposes to unite elements offered by entities that have been at odds with each other—private insurance companies and public behavioral health organizations.
Roughly two months after the Department of Health and Human Services ended the direct blending of physical and mental healthcare, DHHS Director Robert Gordon briefed lawmakers on a new physical-mental health integration approach.
Part of the proposal is the idea of creating multiple “specialty integrated plans” or SIPs, which the DHHS said in a press release today would “bring together the management skills of traditional insurance companies with the expertise and depth of behavioral health organizations.”
The association for the state’s Community Mental Health agencies would run at least one plan offering these services to the public.
Gordon also suggested other plans be created, like one controlled by private Medicaid health plans and another one led by providers and hospitals, as examples.
The DHHS director stressed to a joint hearing of the House and Senate DHHS appropriations subcommittees that many details of the plan are to be determined and that the department plans to get feedback during four public forums in 2020 to fully design the plan. He wants the whole system to be implemented by 2022.
Bob Sheehan, CEO [Read More]